| |
|
|
|
The Company can Restrict
Operations on your Entire Farm |
|
|
|
Prior to commencement of an activity
requiring leave, the landowner must request that the pipeline
company mark out the location of its pipe with stakes. The
pipeline company is required to mark the location of the pipe
within three working days of the landowner’s request. Pursuant to
s.9 of the Crossing Regulations, Part I, a pipeline company which
has received a request to locate its pipeline may designate an
area situated in the vicinity of the proposed facility or
excavation, which may extend beyond the control zone (to the whole
of the landowner’s property), in which no excavation may be
performed either before the pipes are located and marked or before
the expiry of the three working day period, whichever comes first. |
|
|
|
Obtaining Leave of the
Company may take up to 18 Days |
|
|
|
Where a landowner requests leave of
a pipeline company, that company shall have ten (10) working days
in which to notify the landowner of its decision (s.6(1) Crossing
Regulations, Part II). If approval for the activity is granted by
the company, the landowner must provide notice of at least three
(3) working days before commencing work (s.4(f) Crossing
Regulations, Part I), and of at least twenty-four (24) hours prior
to backfilling over a pipe (s.6(p) Crossing Regulations, Part I).
With these notice requirements and taking into consideration
weekends and holidays particularly during the summer months when
much of landowner activity requiring leave of the pipeline company
occurs, these consent and notice requirements may delay the
commencement of necessary work for up to eighteen (18) calendar
days. |
|
|
|
The Company may Decide how
your Operation Should Proceed |
|
|
|
Pursuant to s.14(1) of the Crossing
Regulations, Part II, the pipeline company may, at its own
discretion, suspend the permission given to construct or install a
facility or to excavate if it is satisfied that unsafe
construction practices have been or are being used. Affected
activities must cease immediately once the company suspends its
permission.
At any time during construction or installation of a
facility on, under or adjacent to the easement, the pipeline
company may stipulate specific practices to be undertaken by the
landowner to lessen any detrimental effect that the facility may
have on a pipe. Landowners must comply with all practices
stipulated by the company pursuant to s.4(h) of the Crossing
Regulations, Part I.
Section 4(n) of the Crossing Regulations,
Part I, requires landowners to maintain in a state of good repair
any facility they construct or install on, under or adjacent to
the pipeline easement. Under s.15(1) of the Crossing Regulations,
Part II, pipeline companies shall inspect such facilities and
shall inform landowners of any deterioration that is detected.
Landowners must immediately correct any deterioration noted by the
pipeline company.
Section 4(o) of the Crossing Regulations, Part
I, requires landowners to notify the pipeline company, in writing,
of any proposed abandonment or removal of any facility affecting a
pipe or right-of-way of the pipeline and (under section 4(n)(ii))
to restore the site to the satisfaction of the pipeline company. |
|
|
|
You need Company
Permission to Cross the Easement with Equipment |
|
|
|
Section 112(2) of the NEB Act
provides that no person shall operate a vehicle or other mobile
equipment across a pipeline without leave of the pipeline company
who owns and operates the affected line. There is no limitation
provided in either the NEB Act or the Crossing Regulations on the
length of time a company may take to respond to a request for
leave to cross, nor is there any requirement that the company
provide reasons for refusal to grant such leave.
|
|
|
|
You can Face Fines of up
to $1 Million and 5 Years in Prison |
|
|
|
Under sections 112(7) and 51.1(1) of
the NEB Act, NEB inspection officers are empowered to issue orders
requiring compliance with s.112 and related regulations.
Contravention of such an order may result under Section 51.4(1) in
criminal prosecution and penalty. On summary conviction,
landowners are liable to a fine of up to one-hundred thousand
dollars ($100,000) and/or imprisonment for up to one year. Upon
conviction on indictment, the penalty increases to a fine of up to
one-million dollars ($1,000,000) and/or imprisonment up to five
(5) years. |
|
|
|
Our View - Companies,
not Farmers, Responsible for Pipeline Safety |
|
|
|
CAPLA believes that all agricultural pipeline sites
must be safe for both today’s and tomorrow’s farming equipment and
operational practices. Landowner easement agreements signed in the
past do not restrict the equipment that can be used on the
pipeline right-of-way, and these easement agreements should be
honoured by the pipeline companies. Today’s farmers use large
modern equipment for greater efficiency and innovative farming
practices which include deep tillage, and pipelines must
accommodate this. Like any other transportation system – highways,
railways, bridges, etc. – pipelines should be updated and improved
when it becomes clear that they are no longer safe. However, land
use restrictions created by s.112 and the Pipeline Crossing
Regulations allow pipeline companies to avoid this obligation,
instead placing the burden on farmers.
In effect, pipeline landowners are paying for
inadequacies of pipeline depth-of-cover and pipe wall thickness
through the loss of efficiency and managerial flexibility caused
by land use restrictions like the control zone. This is a cost
that should be borne by those benefiting from the pipelines –
pipeline companies and end-users. That’s how other modes of
transportation work – those who drive on the roads pay for the
roads. If pipes as constructed by the pipeline companies are
unsafe, then companies should be required to repair their pipes,
and ensure that they are buried deep enough in the ground. |
|
|
|